• 欢迎访问:祀与戎,国之大事,在祀与戎。 手机号码:
  • 欢迎访问:祀与戎,国之大事,在祀与戎。
  • 欢迎访问:祀与戎,国之大事,在祀与戎。祀与戎
  • 祀与戎,国之大事,在祀与戎www.siyurong.com
  • 祀与戎,国之大事,在祀与戎。如果您觉得本站非常有看点,那么赶紧使用 Ctrl+D

Lancet:口服索玛鲁肽的降糖及减重效果优于皮下注射利拉鲁肽

思想观点 siyurong 5年前 (2021-07-26) 4次浏览 已收录 0个评论
  • ①711名2型糖尿病患者分为3组:285名口服索玛鲁肽、284名皮下注射利拉鲁肽、142名使用安慰剂;
  • ②干预26周后,索玛鲁肽组患者的糖化血红蛋白变化值为-1.2%,利拉鲁肽组患者为-1.1%,安慰剂组为-0.2%;
  • ③口服索玛鲁肽相比于皮下注射利拉鲁肽有显著非劣性,且相比于安慰剂有显著优势;
  • ④另外,相比于利拉鲁肽组及安慰剂组,索玛鲁肽组的患者体重降低显著增加,不良事件发生率也更高。

来自Lancet上发表的一项3a期临床试验结果,在超过700名2型糖尿病患者中,发现相比于皮下注射利拉鲁肽或使用安慰剂,口服索玛鲁肽有着更好的减重效果,且其降糖效果与皮下注射利拉鲁肽相当并优于安慰剂。

 

 

图片

Lancet
[IF:79.321]

Oral semaglutide versus subcutaneous liraglutide and placebo in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 4): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3a trial

口服索马鲁肽与皮下注射利拉鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病:一项随机双盲3a期临床试验

10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31271-1

2019-06-08, Article

Abstract & Authors:展开

Abstract:收起
Background
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are effective treatments for type 2 diabetes, lowering glycated haemoglobin (HbA 1c) and weight, but are currently only approved for use as subcutaneous injections. Oral semaglutide, a novel GLP-1 agonist, was compared with subcutaneous liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Methods
In this randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3a trial, we recruited patients with type 2 diabetes from 100 sites in 12 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with HbA 1c of 7·0–9·5% (53–80·3 mmol/mol), on a stable dose of metformin (≥1500 mg or maximum tolerated) with or without a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor. Participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) with an interactive web-response system and stratified by background glucose-lowering medication and country of origin, to once-daily oral semaglutide (dose escalated to 14 mg), once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (dose escalated to 1·8 mg), or placebo for 52 weeks. Two estimands were defined: treatment policy (regardless of study drug discontinuation or rescue medication) and trial product (assumed all participants were on study drug without rescue medication) in all participants who were randomly assigned. The treatment policy estimand was the primary estimand. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 26 in HbA 1c (oral semaglutide superiority vs placebo and non-inferiority [margin: 0·4%] and superiority vs subcutaneous liraglutide) and the confirmatory secondary endpoint was change from baseline to week 26 in bodyweight (oral semaglutide superiority vs placebo and liraglutide). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT02863419, and the European Clinical Trials registry, number EudraCT 2015-005210-30.
Findings
Between Aug 10, 2016, and Feb 7, 2017, 950 patients were screened, of whom 711 were eligible and randomly assigned to oral semaglutide (n=285), subcutaneous liraglutide (n=284), or placebo (n=142). 341 (48%) of 711 participants were female and the mean age was 56 years (SD 10). All participants were given at least one dose of study drug, and 277 (97%) participants in the oral semaglutide group, 274 (96%) in the liraglutide group, and 134 (94%) in the placebo group completed the 52-week trial period. Mean change from baseline in HbA 1c at week 26 was −1·2% (SE 0·1) with oral semaglutide, −1·1% (SE 0·1) with subcutaneous liraglutide, and −0·2% (SE 0·1) with placebo. Oral semaglutide was non-inferior to subcutaneous liraglutide in decreasing HbA 1c (estimated treatment difference [ETD] −0·1%, 95% CI −0·3 to 0·0; p<0·0001) and superior to placebo (ETD −1·1%, −1·2 to −0·9; p<0·0001) by use of the treatment policy estimand. By use of the trial product estimand, oral semaglutide had significantly greater decreases in HbA 1c than both subcutaneous liraglutide (ETD −0·2%, 95% CI −0·3 to −0·1; p=0·0056) and placebo (ETD −1·2%, −1·4 to −1·0; p<0·0001) at week 26. Oral semaglutide resulted in superior weight loss (−4·4 kg [SE 0·2]) compared with liraglutide (−3·1 kg [SE 0·2]; ETD −1·2 kg, 95% CI −1·9 to −0·6; p=0·0003) and placebo (−0·5 kg [SE 0·3]; ETD −3·8 kg, −4·7 to −3·0; p<0·0001) at week 26 (treatment policy). By use of the trial product estimand, weight loss at week 26 was significantly greater with oral semaglutide than with subcutaneous liraglutide (−1·5 kg, 95% CI −2·2 to −0·9; p<0·0001) and placebo (ETD −4·0 kg, −4·8 to −3·2; p<0·0001). Adverse events were more frequent with oral semaglutide (n=229 [80%]) and subcutaneous liraglutide (n=211 [74%]) than with placebo (n=95 [67%]).
Interpretation
Oral semaglutide was non-inferior to subcutaneous liraglutide and superior to placebo in decreasing HbA 1c, and superior in decreasing bodyweight compared with both liraglutide and placebo at week 26. Safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide were similar to subcutaneous liraglutide. Use of oral semaglutide could potentially lead to earlier initiation of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in the diabetes treatment continuum of care.

First Authors:
Richard Pratley

Correspondence Authors:
Richard Pratley

All Authors:
Richard Pratley,Aslam Amod,Søren Tetens Hoff,Takashi Kadowaki,Ildiko Lingvay,Michael Nauck,Karen Boje Pedersen,Trine Saugstrup,Juris J Meier


祀与戎 , 版权所有蜀ICP备14023000号-6丨如未注明 , 均为原创丨本网站采用BY-NC-SA协议进行授权
转载请注明原文链接:Lancet:口服索玛鲁肽的降糖及减重效果优于皮下注射利拉鲁肽
喜欢 (0)
发表我的评论
取消评论

表情 贴图 加粗 删除线 居中 斜体 签到

Hi,您需要填写昵称和邮箱!

  • 昵称 (必填)
  • 邮箱 (必填)
  • 网址